(proposal) Position space as faciliator and funnel to discussion
Thomas von der Elbe
ThomasvonderElbe at gmx.de
Sat Dec 29 04:31:38 EST 2012
yes, this feature is good!
And yes, I think you are right, since we have the abbreviations for the
names, we can drop the long names.
I think the colour is not the problem. Imo it is just, that the grey
names form a column and thus somehow disturb the line, they belong to.
It looks as though they belong together instead of to their line. I
think this would change, if there was one line of pixels (background)
between each line.
Maybe we should also replace end-candidate and voter with tree-trunk and
branches or basic/root positions and branches?
Why is my new title not showing up? Is it because it waits for the new
vote-count? But this couldn't be, right?
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 0:53, Michael Allan wrote:
> I spruced up Wicket votespace and added position titles.
> It isn't beautiful. I think the colour wrecks it, but I wan't sure
> how else to distinguish titles from usernames. Now I'm thinking we
> should drop the usernames and leave a blank space when there's no
> title. What do you guys think?
> Instructions for adding a title to a position are here:
> This work is part of item 5: http://zelea.com/w/G/p/c
> I'll carry on with 4, 5 and 6 till I think we have enough to write up
> item 3. I have an idea that 3 can be generalized to all issues (not
> just world peace) and used as the content of the home page. But not
> if it's just abstract diagrams. It won't be convincing. It has to
> point to running code.
More information about the Votorola