WYSIWYG editor for pollwiki
Alex Rollin
alex.rollin at gmail.com
Wed Aug 18 04:49:54 EDT 2010
The editor as I have used it is amazing. Mike, have you tried it out?
Perhaps you can help us to answer your questions. Would you like it f we
installed another pollwiki to test on perhaps? Would that be a way to
answer your questions?
In my experience the editor does not insert junk html.
The editor is designed to respect parser functions, though I cannot speak
for having seen it work with RDF.
The editor IS better than plain text, though, as it strips formatting from
outside on paste. A good thing in my book.
I think it is better if everyone uses it.
As Thomas discovered this is not the editor on Wikipedia. The one they use
is "lighter weight" and is not WYSIWYG. I think lightweight is good, but
overruled by easy of use.
I am tempted to design a "Dream" position crafting environment. What would
that look like, diff'ing while writing? Seeing the forest while writing?
Sending notes implicitly by accepting position text, whole or in part, from
fellows?
A
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Thomas von der Elbe <
ThomasvonderElbe at gmx.de> wrote:
> I like this thing a lot!
>
> Unfortunatly I cannot really answer Mikes 3 questions:
>
>
> 1) Will it interfere with the formatting of wikitext? If a single
>> voter opts to use this editor, will it generate false position
>> differences (due to its formatting quirks) that the entire tree
>> of drafters must henceforth follow?
>>
>> 2) Is its formatting of wikitext stable? Will a content change in
>> one part of a document affect the formatting in another?
>> (Formatting might also change from revision to revision of the
>> editor, but that would be a less serious, once-only inconvenience
>> for the drafters.)
>>
>> 3) Is it compatible with the special markup used by Semantic
>> MediaWiki?
>>
>
> @ 1): In order to enjoy the luxury of the thing, I would rather "force"
> everyone to use it, than not use it at all. Also, in this editor you can
> still write the old wiki-syntax and it gets translated.
>
> I hope, we can use it.
>
>
> T
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.reluk.ca/list/votorola/attachments/20100818/0de5b450/attachment-0007.html>
More information about the Votorola
mailing list