Thomas just helped me do a little rewrite.<div><br></div><div>****************************************<br><div><br></div><div><div><div>Michel, the energy behind your threat is associated with my stated intentions to expel you from the board. I said in private that I want to vote you off the board. I don't see a problem with this intention. This is how democracy works.</div>
<div><br></div><div>To me, this is about democracy, and this is good. Voting for and against a position or for a representative is a good thing. </div><div><br></div><div>Maybe this is the subject we should talk about?</div>
<div><br></div><div>If this was a democracy I would vote you off.</div><div><br></div><div>I say I have a right to critique your use of authority and the decisions you make.</div><div><br></div><div>I want users to have rights. I want users to be represented on the board.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I see democracy as an important part of a community.</div><div><br></div><div>I have a right to contact others. I have a right to learn from their concerns and to share information with them.</div><div>
<br></div><div>Each individual has the right to ignore me.</div></div><div><br></div><div>*********</div><div><br></div><div>Alex</div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Alex Rollin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:alex.rollin@gmail.com">alex.rollin@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">I appreciate your interest in getting involved. I also see the inequality as part of the problem.<div><br></div><div>
Please feel free to let me know how I can be of assistance in your contemplation of this situation within which I find myself.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Perhaps you are aware of research on the subject.</div><div><br></div><div><font color="#888888">A</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Anne Moreland <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:judithdaviestripp@gmail.com" target="_blank">judithdaviestripp@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><font size="4">Alex,</font></div>
<div><font size="4">Inequalities in power distribution usually results in the nemesis of democratic oganization. I would like to be of assistance. I think what you are wantring to address is crucial.</font></div>
<div><font size="4">j<br><br></font></div>
<div class="gmail_quote"><div><div></div><div>On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Alex Rollin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:alex.rollin@gmail.com" target="_blank">alex.rollin@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
</div></div><blockquote style="border-left:#ccc 1px solid;margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex" class="gmail_quote"><div><div></div><div>Hello friends,
<div><br></div>
<div>I've been involved in a horrific (for me) "speaking truth to power" exercise this month.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>You can see the archive in public! </div>
<div><a href="http://listcultures.org/pipermail/p2presearch_listcultures.org/2010-August/thread.html" target="_blank">http://listcultures.org/pipermail/p2presearch_listcultures.org/2010-August/thread.html</a></div>
<div><br></div>
<div>The main participants in the thread are Michel Bauwens and myself, Alex Rollin.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Michel is a founding member of the P2P Foundation and sits on the board. He has taken issue with me, and sees my wishes to engage in some sort of official conflict resolution procedure as a power grab and a threat (paraphrasing). I am under threat of being banned from the community and could lose some access to 774 pages of work I've done on the wiki.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>My requests: </div>
<div><br></div>
<div>1. that the board of the P2P Foundation put some policy in place that outlines the rights of the users of the P2P Foundation website. (Users have no rights and can be banned/deleted ad hoc.)</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>2. That one of these rights be access to a conflict resolution procedure; a procedure which has Foundation policy as the backbone. (Currently there is no policy at all.)</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>3. That the officials of the Foundation develop some "Pledge of Commitment" that says, basically, that hey will use a process to handle conflict and abstain from the exercise of official power when they are involved in the conflict. (Wikipedia has one like this here <a href="http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Pledge_of_personal_commitment" target="_blank">http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Pledge_of_personal_commitment</a> )</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>My concern:</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>I am concerned that users who watch the use of power exercised as a personal warfare by board officials of the foundation, power that can ban and dismiss ad hoc, that individual users become less and less willing to participate, and finally become silent. I contend that this type of behavior, of banning people for having ideas and wishes, is deserving of some reigning in. (Read about the Foundation here if you like <a href="http://p2pfoundation.net/P2P_Foundation:About" target="_blank">http://p2pfoundation.net/P2P_Foundation:About</a> )</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>My request to you:</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>A member of the board does not see this process of "silencing" happening, as such, and would appreciate some feedback on the subject. He has asked me to collect letters from people about their feelings on this dynamic of the exercise of power, and has promised to respect whatever confidentiality the authors request. His names is James Burke, <a href="mailto:lifesized@gmail.com" target="_blank">lifesized@gmail.com</a> .</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>My disclosure:</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>I realize that, if you look at the link above you will see an incredible amount of information. In fact, this is the ugliest, nastiest discussion I have ever had the public pleasure of participating in. I have made mistakes, and I have done my best, and I am currently silent under the threat of banishment. I have participated to this extent because I have worked on 774 pages of "work product" on one of the P2P Foundation systems, the wiki, from which I could be banned at any moment. Larger than that, though, I generally agree with the mission of the foundation, and I value the multitude of perspectives that create the wiki </div>
<div><br></div>
<div>I would not fault you for criticizing my behavior. I do not think I did "all the right things" by any means. However, how "right" constructed, here, and how it is enforce are the actual issues. As you consider how you would proceed, you are free to consider my behavior and provide feedback to me which I would value greatly as a friend and fellow Guerilla Gardener.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>As this was my largest effort at Guerilla Gardening to date, and as I have seen horrendous failure, I see this as relevant. I do not believe that you are bound to support me, or that you should, really.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>If you choose to participate, though, please know that I see our mutual interest as that of Guerilla Gardeners, and that I believe that this "silencing" dynamic, is an important feature of the space. When participatory democracy is online, it can be possible to simply remove access to the systems. This silences people.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>How should folks understand this as feature/benefit of "online participatory governance" ?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>What should a group understand about these dynamics and how they might interact with the policy requests I am making above? What is an appropriate board policy for engaging community stakeholders when the conversation is in a public forum?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>What should James know, on that subject, based on what you see in the archive?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Thank you for considering my request. I appreciate you are busy, and value the opportunity to connect with you further on this subject.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Sincerely,</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Alex Rollin</div>
<div><br></div></div></div><font color="#888888">
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div><div>
<p></p>-- <br>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Votorola" group.<br>To post to this group, send an email to <a href="mailto:votorola@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">votorola@googlegroups.com</a>.<br>
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to <a href="mailto:votorola%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">votorola+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br>For more options, visit this group at <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/votorola?hl=en-GB" target="_blank">http://groups.google.com/group/votorola?hl=en-GB</a>.<br>
</div></font></blockquote></div><div><div></div><div><br>
<p></p>
-- <br>
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Votorola" group.<br>
To post to this group, send an email to <a href="mailto:votorola@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">votorola@googlegroups.com</a>.<br>
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to <a href="mailto:votorola%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">votorola+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br>
For more options, visit this group at <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/votorola?hl=en-GB" target="_blank">http://groups.google.com/group/votorola?hl=en-GB</a>.<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div> </div></div>
<p></p>
-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Votorola" group.<br />
To post to this group, send an email to votorola@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to votorola+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.<br />
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/votorola?hl=en-GB.<br />