Thanks. We (the people) like the following things: * Open source * General Public License * Open and visible voting, webpage for reading for all members, not only admin. (for safety so that the result can not be questioned, at least as a choice). * every vote should be possible to question and investigate by contacting the voter. * Anonymity through name of user or anonynomous e-mail. Admin must however be able to register members to avoid double votes cast. * Presentation of the result in numbers and procentually on a public webpage. * Public forum for debate where we agree on what to vote for and how to describe the issue and the choices. (connection to googlegroups might be a very ok solution). optional but very much needed in decisionmaking. *Priority voting ex. 1C 2B 3A *Budget voting ex. commersials 30, material for the streets 40. Median value is the result. The more of these things you listen to the more likely that we will use it. Best regards Martin <div> 2008/2/23, Michael Allan <<a href="mailto:mike@zelea.com">mike@zelea.com</a>>:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Martin Gustavsson wrote: > The members of Aktiv Demokrati sitting in parliament acts in accordance to > the proportional result of the vote in the party itself. ... All the same, if Aktiv Demokrati ever needs a new electoral system, you're welcome to use Votorola. It's free software. Beta trials will be in roughly 4 months. Cheers, -- Michael Allan <a href="http://zelea.com/">http://zelea.com/</a>