[MG] Global advisory parliament - was Hi & Re: Invitation to Metagovernment project

Wybo Wiersma mail at wybowiersma.net
Thu May 26 19:38:42 EDT 2011


Thanks for the welcomes, Thomas, Michael, and Marcos,

Some quick replies:

@Marcos, Pangaia looks interesting, though to fully grasp it I'd
probably need to read more about it, which I will do later. In the
meantime you might want to get in touch with tav & others, in the #esp
IRC channel on freenode.net, as he was/is working on something
similar.

> > Why focus on critical mass:
> > - Because it is the biggest problem facing online communities, and one
> >   that is often ignored (no, if you build it, they will not come!).
> >   And without it, nothing but marginalization will ensue.
> 
> Mass cannot be the only possible answer.  Thomas (offlist) mentions
> drafting media in this context, to which I would add Wikipedia as an
> example.  Wikipedia had a low mass initially, but it was not thereby
> marginalized.  It grew continually and did not stall. *

@Michael, Wikipedia could start out small, because a small
Encyclopedia (especially when indexed by Google so people find the
article if it existed) is already an Encyclopedia, and useful in 
its own right.

While on the contrary, a small group of people interested in some X
and drafting/voting about it among themselves is, politically
speaking, nothing but a fringe interest-group that is managed 
somewhat democratically.

To people outside that specific organisation, and to politicians, it
will be nothing, and completely uninteresting (thus not grow further).

At best such an organisation would be looked at for it's management
techniques, but not for its political views. Politics is about 
participation in numbers (or other forms of leverage such as money if 
one is cynical), about people realizing others are critical of some 
situation as well, and politicians facing numbers, it is about 
critical mass.

> I suspect that cultural and other aggregative forms of expression can
> be immune to network effects, and I would place legislative expression
> - even if it were stamped ADVISORY ONLY - well within that category.

No politician is going to listen before you have a few million, or at
least a few hundred thousand (in smaller countries) people voting (and
nobody is going to vote unless people believe politicians will listen
(soon), or they derive other benefits (blog-app, game with friends,
etc...)).

Wybo

> -- 
> Michael Allan
> 
> Toronto, +1 416-699-9528
> http://zelea.com/



Originally posted to the mailing list of the Metagovernment Project:
http://metagovernment.org/mailman/listinfo/start_metagovernment.org



More information about the Votorola mailing list