SOS (coco-d) Architecture for communicative and communicable democracy

[Anne Moreland]

Yes Alex that is the correct site. If you just register as yourself you will
be able to see and review all of the submitted programs. There are some very
interesting submissions!!!! I think it's a unique opportunity especially
since all of the submissions have been test run.
JAnne

On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Alex Rollin <alex.rollin at gmail.com> wrote:

> Can you point us at a link for that?
>
> I found http://www.vitalizing-democracy.org/ .
>
> Is that right?
>
> A
>
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Anne Moreland <
> judithdaviestripp at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Mike, You have given me some friendly advice before. Please let me give
>> you some now. Before you make any major paradigm shifts PLEASE check out
>> -meaning join- the vitalizing democracy project, and examine the approx 300
>> participatory projects online there.
>> JAD/JAnne
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Michael Allan <mike at zelea.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I feel more confident about the architecture now that we have this
>>> cross-forum technique (guerilla gardening, or whatever).  It no longer
>>> feels like we're in a race.  The only urgency now is maybe to document
>>> everything.  I can probably start on that (it's going to take a
>>> while).  I'll try to make it:
>>>
>>>  * Collaborative - in the wiki
>>>
>>>  * Domain neutral - so it's easy for cross-domain folks like Alex to
>>>    mesh with
>>>
>>>  * Rigorous - so we can base academic papers on it
>>>
>>>  * Accessible - maybe with summaries for non-experts
>>>
>>>  * Public domain - so it can easily be copied into online
>>>    encyclopedias
>>>
>>> Is there anything else I should consider?  Is the title OK?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael Allan
>>>
>>> Toronto, +1 647-436-4521
>>> http://zelea.com/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.reluk.ca/list/votorola/attachments/20100814/abe307a1/attachment-0007.html>