Option for private votes

[Martin Gustavsson]

Well, the trustworthyness of "the moderators" of our current democracy is an
issue too and It should be, always. Diffrent polls are made to confirms the
results of the elections. The less they differ the more trustworthy they
are.

The best trust we will get if everyone decides to be open with their
opinion. I think respect of diffrent opinions and more curage comes with
more democracy. When laws are made to ensure social safety for
everyone independent of opinion, independent of no work or work, then there
will be true freedom of speech and true human rights.


2008/7/16 Michael Allan <mike at zelea.com>:

>
> Martin Gustavsson wrote:
> >
> > I suggest that direct voting should always be 100% public and relative
> > anonymity should be obtained using an alias through the system so that
> > votes can always be verified by either by mailing and asking, through
> > moderators or other official independent control function. ...
>
> So we'd depend on the moderators to verify that the aliased voter is
> present in the voter list and eligible to vote.  The verification
> would be by spot checks, on demand.  And the trustworthiness of the
> moderators would somehow be assured.  On first glance, it could work.
>
>
> >
>


-- 
Peace vision -> More democracy -> How? -> www.aktivdemokrati.se


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.reluk.ca/list/votorola/attachments/20080716/acfb1d2c/attachment-0007.html>